New: our own Hairmetry line. Every ingredient explained

Condition

Androgenetic alopecia (male and female pattern hair loss)

The most common cause of hair loss is an inherited, slowly progressive shrinking of scalp follicles; it cannot be cured, but finasteride, minoxidil and transplants slow, partly reverse or camouflage it.

hair lossreceding hairlinethinninglow volume

Simplified diagram of the Norwood scale. Some temple recession after puberty is almost universal, and even dermatologists agree only moderately on stage. Treat a stage as a rough band, not a diagnosis. Norwood 1975 ↗ Gan 2005 ↗ Guarrera 2009 ↗
Simplified diagram of part-width scales used for women. Women usually lose hair as diffuse thinning with a widening part and the front hairline kept, rather than male-type recession. Ludwig 1977 ↗ Ramos 2015 ↗

Key takeaways

  • It is very common and mostly inherited. The European S3 guideline puts lifetime frequency at up to 80% of white men and 42% of women (Kanti 2018), and a 2025 Canadian consensus says 40 to 50% of men and women are affected by age 50 (Landells 2025). Figures vary by ancestry and study.
  • The core change is miniaturization, not sudden shedding. Susceptible follicles make progressively shorter, thinner hairs until they look like fine vellus hair. Frontal, mid-scalp and crown follicles are vulnerable; the back and sides are spared, which is why transplants work (Liu 2025).
  • Genetics is polygenic, not "your mother's father". Genome-wide studies have found more than 380 associated loci (Liu 2025), and polygenic scores built on European data predict poorly in African men (AUC 0.513 to 0.546, barely above chance) (Janivara 2025).
  • For men the best-proven options are oral finasteride and topical minoxidil. Finasteride 1 mg/day in two 1-year trials (1,553 men) added 107 hairs over placebo at 1 year and 138 at 2 years in a 5.1 cm2 vertex circle, while placebo men kept losing hair (Kaufman 1998). A meta-analysis of 12 trials (3,927 men) found a number needed to treat of 5.6 at 1 year and 3.4 at 2 or more years for a man to see himself as improved, with a small rise in erectile dysfunction (number needed to harm about 82) (Mella 2010).
  • For women, topical minoxidil has the best randomized evidence. A Cochrane review (47 trials, 5,290 women) found minoxidil 2% about doubled the chance of a moderate-to-marked regrowth rating (RR 1.93) and added about 13 hairs per cm2; finasteride 1 mg showed no benefit over placebo in three small trials (van Zuuren 2016).
  • Anti-androgens in women have thinner evidence than people assume. In 48 premenopausal women, spironolactone 100 mg on top of 3% minoxidil raised terminal hair count by 9.5 vs 5.3 hairs per cm2 over 24 weeks, which was not statistically significant, and 37.5% had menstrual irregularity (Werachattawatchai 2025). A 204-woman trial found bicalutamide 50 mg slightly ahead of spironolactone 100 mg on trichoscopy but not on clinical endpoints (Jha 2026). Both are off-label and unsafe in pregnancy.
  • Treatments only work while you use them. Placebo arms show ongoing loss, and stopping an effective drug lets the process resume.
  • It affects wellbeing: a meta-analysis of 41 studies (7,995 people) found moderate impairment in quality of life and emotions but no pooled link with clinical depression (Huang 2021).
  • Pattern loss can travel with metabolic risk. A meta-analysis of 19 studies found about 3.5 times the odds of metabolic syndrome in people with AGA, but this is an association, not proof of cause (Qiu 2022).

How it works and what it looks like

In men the process is driven by androgen signalling in vulnerable follicles, which shortens the growth phase with each cycle. In women the molecular basis is less clear and oestrogen may be protective (Liu 2025; Kearney 2026). See DHT and pattern hair loss.

  • Men: temple recession and crown thinning, progressing to a horseshoe of fringe hair. The Norwood-Hamilton scale (I to VII) is standard.
  • Women: diffuse thinning over the crown with a widening centre part and usually a preserved frontal hairline (Ludwig I to III). See hair loss scales.
  • Onset is usually after puberty in men and after menopause in women, though younger people can be affected.

Diagnosis rests on the pattern, family history, a pull test and measured differences in hair width. Look-alikes in women include chronic telogen effluvium, diffuse alopecia areata and scarring alopecias, so clinicians check iron, thyroid and signs of androgen excess (Kearney 2026). See telogen effluvium, alopecia areata, PCOS and hair and thyroid and hair.

What the studies show about treatments

Doses are as studied.

Option Tested in Notes
Finasteride oral 1 mg/day Men Prescription drug approved for male AGA in the US; mood and sexual-effect warnings in the EU and UK. No benefit at 1 mg in women in the Cochrane review; contraindicated in pregnancy
Finasteride topical spray Men A 2026 phase III in 270 Chinese men beat placebo on hair count; not FDA-approved
Dutasteride oral Mostly men A review of 9 studies found 0.5 mg more effective than finasteride 1 mg on hair count with similar adverse events, but only 4 were randomized (Almudimeegh 2024). Off-label for hair outside Korea and Japan
Minoxidil topical 2 to 5% Men and women Once-daily 5% foam was non-inferior to twice-daily 2% solution in 113 women, with less irritation (Blume-Peytavi 2011)
Minoxidil oral, low dose Men and women Four trials (279 patients): density similar to topical, more unwanted hair growth (RR 2.01) (Sobral 2025). Off-label; cardiovascular caution
Spironolactone, bicalutamide Women Off-label; avoid in pregnancy
Low-level light Both Higher hair counts than sham, but not clearly better self-rated results
PRP Both Conflicting trials
Microneedling Both The largest trial found no extra benefit over minoxidil
Hair transplant Stable pattern, good donor Medication still needed to protect native hair
Exosomes, mesotherapy Mixed Low-quality or preclinical data
Camouflage: scalp micropigmentation, fibres, haircuts Both Immediate; does not change hair biology

The Canadian consensus (11 physicians, 45 interventions, partly industry-affiliated) recommended seven interventions: oral dutasteride, oral finasteride, topical finasteride, topical minoxidil, PRP, microneedling and oral minoxidil. It rejected 17, including caffeine, rosemary oil and adenosine (Landells 2025). The European S3 guideline is the main evidence-based guideline but has expired (Kanti 2018).

What is coming: a 2026 review lists topical anti-androgens such as clascoterone and GT20029, prolactin-receptor biologics and extended-release minoxidil, all investigational for hair (Agrawal 2026). See the treatment ladder for the ranked order.

Hair type notes

  • Women who might become pregnant need effective contraception on anti-androgens. Finasteride, dutasteride and spironolactone are unsafe in pregnancy.
  • In Black women, rule out traction and central centrifugal scarring causes before assuming pattern loss (see CCCA and traction alopecia).
  • Tight curl can hide early thinning in photos; fine, low-density hair shows loss sooner. None of this changes which treatments work.
  • A flaky or inflamed scalp needs diagnosis first, because inflammation can cause shedding that looks like pattern loss.

Bottom line

Start early, because treatment keeps hair more than it regrows it, and photograph the same areas monthly under the same light. Topical minoxidil is the first-line option for both sexes; oral finasteride is the best-proven drug for men. Give treatment 6 to 12 months, and expect an early shed after starting minoxidil. See a dermatologist if loss is sudden, patchy, itchy, painful or scarring. Prescription medicines are information, not advice. Discuss with a doctor.

Studies 16

Kanti V et al. Evidence-based (S3) guideline for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia in women and in men – short version. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018

Design
guideline

Result: A European guideline states pattern hair loss affects up to 80% of white men and 42% of women over a lifetime.

Read the study ↗

Landells I et al. A Canadian consensus on androgenetic alopecia. J Cutan Med Surg. 2025

Design
guideline
People
11
Who
11 Canadian physicians (Delphi consensus; some co-authors employed by L'Oreal Canada)

Tested: expert ratings of 17+ interventions

Result: Recommended oral and topical finasteride, oral dutasteride, minoxidil, PRP and microneedling; listed flutamide among interventions not recommended.

Read the study ↗

Kearney CA et al. Androgenetic alopecia in women: narrative review. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2026

Design
review
Who
women with androgenetic alopecia

Tested: review of treatments

Result: Only topical minoxidil is FDA-approved for female pattern hair loss; antiandrogens such as spironolactone are used off-label.

Read the study ↗

Liu Y et al. Androgenetic alopecia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2025

Design
review
Who
review of androgenetic alopecia

Tested: review

Result: More than 380 loci including androgen and WNT pathway genes; the molecular basis of female AGA remains undetermined; occipital follicles are androgen-resistant.

Read the study ↗

Janivara R et al. Uncovering the genetic architecture and evolutionary roots of androgenetic alopecia in African men. HGG Adv. 2025

Design
other
Who
African men

Tested: genome-wide analysis and polygenic scores

Result: Polygenic scores built on European data predicted poorly in African men (AUC 0.513-0.546, barely above chance).

Read the study ↗

Kaufman KD et al. Finasteride in the treatment of men with androgenetic alopecia. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998

Design
rct
People
1,553
Duration
1 year plus 1-year blinded extension
Who
men 18-41 with vertex pattern hair loss

Tested: finasteride 1 mg/day vs placebo

Result: Finasteride grew about 107 more hairs than placebo at 1 year and about 138 more at 2 years in a 5.1 cm2 vertex circle (baseline about 876); placebo men kept losing hair.

Read the study ↗
Show 10 more studies

Mella JM et al. Efficacy and safety of finasteride therapy for androgenetic alopecia: a systematic review. Arch Dermatol. 2010

Design
meta analysis
People
3,927
Who
men with androgenetic alopecia (12 RCTs)

Tested: finasteride vs placebo

Result: Number needed to treat was 5.6 (up to 12 months) and 3.4 (24 months or more) for self-perceived improvement; erectile dysfunction relative risk 2.22 (about 1 extra case per 82 men).

Read the study ↗

van Zuuren EJ et al. Interventions for female pattern hair loss. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016

Design
systematic review
People
5,290
Who
women with female pattern hair loss (47 trials)

Tested: topical minoxidil and other treatments vs placebo

Result: Minoxidil gave about 13.2 more hairs/cm2 than placebo; there was no difference between 2% and 5% in women.

Read the study ↗

Werachattawatchai P et al. Oral spironolactone for female pattern hair loss in premenopausal women: placebo-controlled pilot randomized controlled trial. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2025

Design
rct
People
48
Duration
24 weeks
Who
premenopausal women with female pattern hair loss, all on minoxidil 3%

Tested: spironolactone 100 mg vs placebo

Result: Moderate-to-marked improvement in 38% vs 9% (p = 0.034); terminal hairs +9.5 vs +5.3/cm2 (p = 0.063); menstrual irregularity 37.5%.

Read the study ↗

Jha AK et al. Spironolactone vs bicalutamide in female pattern hair loss: randomized clinical trial. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2026

Design
rct
People
204
Duration
24 weeks
Who
women with female pattern hair loss, single centre in India

Tested: bicalutamide 50 mg vs spironolactone 100 mg

Result: Frontal hair count rose 5.05 vs 3.13/cm2 favouring bicalutamide (p<0.001); vertex 6.32 vs 3.06; the authors found no significant difference in clinical endpoints; adverse events 11.7% vs 18.6%.

Read the study ↗

Huang CH et al. Health-related quality of life, depression, and self-esteem in patients with androgenetic alopecia: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2021

Design
meta analysis
People
7,995
Who
people with androgenetic alopecia (41 studies)

Tested: quality-of-life and mood measures

Result: Moderate impairment in quality of life and emotions; no significant pooled link with clinical depression.

Read the study ↗

Qiu Y et al. Metabolic syndrome and androgenetic alopecia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Derm Venereol. 2022

Design
meta analysis
Who
people with androgenetic alopecia (19 studies)

Tested: association with metabolic syndrome

Result: About 3.5 times the odds of metabolic syndrome, higher with female sex, early onset and African ethnicity; association only.

Read the study ↗

Almudimeegh A et al. Dutasteride vs finasteride in male and female androgenetic alopecia: systematic review. Dermatol Reports. 2024

Design
systematic review
Who
men and women with androgenetic alopecia (9 studies)

Tested: dutasteride vs finasteride

Result: Only two studies enrolled women.

Read the study ↗

Sobral et al. Efficacy and safety of oral minoxidil versus topical solution in androgenetic alopecia: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. 2025

Design
meta analysis
People
279
Who
people with androgenetic alopecia (4 RCTs)

Tested: oral vs topical minoxidil

Result: Hair density did not differ (standardised difference 0.02); oral roughly doubled the risk of hypertrichosis (relative risk 2.01).

Read the study ↗

Blume-Peytavi U et al. A randomized, single-blind trial of 5% minoxidil foam once daily versus 2% minoxidil solution twice daily in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia in women. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011

Design
rct
People
113
Duration
24 weeks
Who
women with androgenetic alopecia

Tested: 5% minoxidil foam once daily vs 2% solution twice daily

Result: Foam was non-inferior to the solution and caused less itch and dandruff.

Read the study ↗

Agrawal A et al. Emerging pharmacotherapies for androgenetic alopecia. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2026

Design
review
Who
review of pattern-hair-loss drugs in development

Tested: emerging drugs including HMI-115, ABS-201, KB-141

Result: Groups HMI-115 and ABS-201 as antibodies that block the prolactin receptor, a route that does not depend on androgens.

Read the study ↗