New: our own Hairmetry line. Every ingredient explained

Procedure

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for hair loss

Your own blood is spun to concentrate platelets and injected into the scalp; pooled trials show a modest gain, but individual trials conflict and each session is costly.

Not applicable Cost $$$ Safety: minor

hair lossthinning

Key takeaways

  • Pooled data are positive but low quality. A 2024 meta-analysis of 13 randomized trials (431 people) found about 27.5 more hairs per cm2 than placebo but no significant change in hair diameter. Heterogeneity was extreme (I2 of 96%) and publication bias was evident (Kieling 2024). Other meta-analyses agree on density (Zhang 2023; Papakonstantinou 2023; Evans 2022).
  • Several well-designed trials were negative. In a 35-person split-scalp trial both sides gained about 16 to 20 hairs per cm2 with no difference between them (Shapiro 2020). Thirty men given 5 sessions saw no improvement (Gressenberger 2020), and trials in women and in advanced male loss were also null (Puig 2016; Mapar 2016).
  • The split-scalp design may hide the effect, because PRP probably spreads to the placebo half. Placebo halves kept about 37 hairs per cm2 more than placebo groups in whole-head trials (Gupta 2022).
  • Protocol seems to matter. Three monthly sessions plus a 3-month booster gave about 30% more hair against about 7% for two sessions three months apart (Hausauer 2018). Across 25 trials, more sessions, shorter intervals, activation, double centrifugation, younger age and female sex were linked to better results (Gupta 2022 NMA).
  • There is no standard product. Only 21% of trials reported all preparation variables (Kramer 2018), and platelet count did not predict response (Rodrigues 2019).
  • It is not better than minoxidil, but may add to it. Nine head-to-head trials against 5% minoxidil found no density difference (Umar 2026). Added to minoxidil, PRP gave about 18 more hairs per cm2 at 5 to 6 months, with low to very low certainty (Yao 2024).
  • Results fade without maintenance. In one trial 4 of 20 men had progressive loss 12 to 16 months after treatment and were retreated (Gentile 2015).

What it is

Whole blood is spun in a centrifuge once or twice to concentrate platelets. Some clinics activate the PRP with calcium or thrombin, then inject it into the thinning scalp. Platelets release growth factors such as PDGF, VEGF and EGF, which might prolong the growth phase and improve blood supply around follicles. Growth-factor content varies widely between patients and sessions. In the US PRP is treated as minimally manipulated autologous tissue, so no PRP product has an FDA hair-loss indication.

What the studies show

  • Gentile 2015, 20 men analysed, 3 sessions 30 days apart: +45.9 hairs per cm2 from baseline in a half-head design (Gentile 2015).
  • Rodrigues 2019, 26 men, 4 injections: higher count, density and share of growing hairs, with no link to platelet count (Rodrigues 2019).
  • Dubin 2020, 30 women, sessions at weeks 0, 4 and 8: 57% vs 7% improved on photos, and hair counts moved +106 vs -52 per cm2. A 52-hair loss in the placebo group suggests measurement noise, so do not take the size of the effect at face value (Dubin 2020).
  • Shapiro 2020 and Gressenberger 2020: no benefit over placebo (see above).
  • Umbrella review: at least 0.05 mL per cm2 (preferably 0.1) and at least 3 monthly sessions were suggested (Li 2023).
  • Guidelines are split. The European S3 guideline (2017) made no recommendation for or against PRP, citing no standard technique, while a 2025 Canadian consensus recommends it (Landells 2025).
  • Breast cancer survivors, 27 patients, split-scalp pilot: both sides gained density with no difference between them, and circulating tumour cells were found in the PRP in 2 of 12 assays, with no tumour seeding seen. Cancer survivors should involve their oncologist (Rossi 2026).

How it's used in studies

Trials typically gave 3 monthly sessions, then maintenance every 3 to 6 months, and judged results at about 6 months. It is aimed at early pattern loss with miniaturized but living follicles; Norwood 4 to 6 was null in one trial. Microneedling does not appear to carry growth factors deep into the skin, so topical PRP after needling is not equivalent to injection (Dhurat 2019). If you consider PRP, ask the clinic about single or double spin, activation, volume per cm2 and platelet concentration.

Side effects and safety

  • Pain, headache, scalp tightness, swelling, redness and pinpoint bleeding are common and short-lived (Dubin 2020).
  • A single 2025 case report described reversible vision loss a month after scalp PRP in a young woman. Causation is unproven (Bibi 2025).
  • Bleeding disorders, anticoagulant use, active scalp infection and autoimmune disease are reasons to avoid it (Nestor 2021).
  • Cost is about $100 to $1,000 a month on one review's scale, and $5,000 to $15,000 over 5 years, usually not covered by insurance (Nestor 2021).

Bottom line

PRP is a possible add-on with a modest and uncertain benefit, not a replacement for minoxidil or finasteride. It makes most sense as a later rung for early loss in people who are already on proven treatment, and it needs ongoing sessions. See the treatment ladder. Discuss with a doctor.

Studies 22

Kieling L et al. Is autologous platelet-rich plasma capable of increasing hair density in patients with androgenic alopecia? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. An Bras Dermatol. 2024

Design
meta analysis
People
431
Who
people with androgenetic alopecia (13 RCTs)

Tested: PRP vs placebo

Result: About +27.5 hairs per cm2 vs placebo, no significant change in diameter; I2 96% and publication bias, so low quality.

Read the study ↗

Zhang X et al. Platelet-rich plasma for androgenetic alopecia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Cutan Med Surg. 2023

Design
meta analysis
People
238
Who
people with androgenetic alopecia (9 RCTs)

Tested: PRP vs placebo

Result: Density rose at 3 and 6 months; hair count and diameter were not significantly different.

Read the study ↗

Papakonstantinou M et al. Autologous platelet-rich plasma treatment for androgenic alopecia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023

Design
meta analysis
Who
people with androgenetic alopecia (11 RCTs)

Tested: PRP vs placebo

Result: Density, thickness and follicle count improved vs placebo.

Read the study ↗

Evans AG et al. Platelet-rich plasma as a therapy for androgenic alopecia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022

Design
meta analysis
People
687
Who
people with androgenetic alopecia (30 studies, 10 RCTs)

Tested: PRP

Result: PRP raised hair density and thickness.

Read the study ↗

Shapiro J et al. Evaluation of platelet-rich plasma as a treatment for androgenetic alopecia: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020

Design
rct
People
35
Who
people with androgenetic alopecia

Tested: three monthly PRP injections vs placebo on opposite sides of the scalp

Result: Both sides improved by about 16-20 hairs per cm2 with no difference between them.

Read the study ↗

Gressenberger P et al. Platelet-rich plasma for androgenetic alopecia treatment: a randomized placebo-controlled pilot study. Acta Derm Venereol. 2020

Design
rct
People
30
Who
men with androgenetic alopecia

Tested: five PRP sessions 4-6 weeks apart vs placebo

Result: No improvement over placebo.

Read the study ↗
Show 16 more studies

Puig CJ et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study on the use of platelet-rich plasma in women with female androgenetic alopecia. Dermatol Surg. 2016

Design
rct
Who
women with female pattern hair loss

Tested: PRP vs placebo

Result: No difference in hair count or hair mass index.

Read the study ↗

Mapar MA et al. Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of androgenetic (male-patterned) alopecia: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2016

Design
rct
People
19
Who
men with Norwood 4-6 hair loss

Tested: two PRP sessions vs placebo in scalp squares

Result: No effect.

Read the study ↗

Gupta AK, Bamimore MA. The effect of placebo in split-scalp and whole-head platelet-rich plasma trials for androgenetic alopecia differs. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022

Design
systematic review
Who
PRP trials in androgenetic alopecia

Tested: split-scalp vs whole-head placebo arms

Result: Placebo halves in split-scalp trials kept about 37 hairs per cm2 more, suggesting PRP spreads to the placebo side.

Read the study ↗

Hausauer AK, Jones DH. Evaluating the efficacy of different platelet-rich plasma regimens for management of androgenetic alopecia: a single-center, blinded, randomized clinical trial. Dermatol Surg. 2018

Design
rct
Who
people with androgenetic alopecia

Tested: three monthly PRP sessions plus a 3-month booster vs two sessions 3 months apart

Result: About 30% more hair with the first regimen vs about 7% with the second.

Read the study ↗

Gupta AK, Bamimore M. Platelet-rich plasma monotherapies for androgenetic alopecia: a network meta-analysis and meta-regression study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022

Design
meta analysis
Who
people with androgenetic alopecia (25 trials, 10 regimens)

Tested: PRP regimens

Result: More sessions, shorter intervals, activation, double centrifugation, younger age and female sex were linked to better results.

Read the study ↗

Li C et al. An umbrella review of the use of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023

Design
systematic review
Who
28 reviews of PRP in androgenetic alopecia

Tested: PRP

Result: Suggested at least 0.05 mL per cm2 (preferably 0.1) and at least 3 monthly sessions.

Read the study ↗

Kramer ME, Keaney TC. Systematic review of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) preparation and composition for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018

Design
systematic review
Who
PRP trials in androgenetic alopecia

Tested: PRP preparation methods

Result: Only 21% of trials reported all preparation variables.

Read the study ↗

Umar M et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of platelet rich plasma (PRP) versus topical minoxidil for androgenetic alopecia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2026

Design
meta analysis
People
451
Who
people with androgenetic alopecia (9 RCTs)

Tested: PRP vs 5% minoxidil

Result: No density difference; satisfaction was higher with PRP.

Read the study ↗

Yao J et al. The additive value of platelet-rich plasma to topical minoxidil in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2024

Design
meta analysis
Who
people with androgenetic alopecia (5 RCTs)

Tested: PRP plus minoxidil vs minoxidil

Result: About +17.8 hairs per cm2 at 5-6 months; certainty low to very low.

Read the study ↗

Gentile P et al. The effect of platelet-rich plasma in hair regrowth: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2015

Design
rct
People
23
Who
men with androgenetic alopecia

Tested: three PRP sessions 30 days apart vs placebo, half-head

Result: +45.9 hairs per cm2 from baseline; 4 of 20 relapsed at 12-16 months.

Read the study ↗

Rodrigues BL et al. Treatment of male pattern alopecia with platelet-rich plasma: a double-blind controlled study with analysis of platelet number and growth factor levels. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019

Design
rct
People
26
Who
men with pattern hair loss

Tested: four PRP injections vs placebo

Result: Hair count, density and share of growing hairs rose; response did not depend on platelet count.

Read the study ↗

Dubin DP et al. The effect of platelet-rich plasma on female androgenetic alopecia: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020

Design
rct
People
30
Duration
24 weeks
Who
women with female pattern hair loss

Tested: PRP at weeks 0, 4 and 8 vs placebo

Result: 57% vs 7% improved on photos; counts +106 vs -52 hairs per cm2, an unusually large swing.

Read the study ↗

Nestor MS et al. Treatment options for androgenetic alopecia: efficacy, side effects, compliance, financial considerations, and ethics. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021

Design
review
Who
people with androgenetic alopecia

Tested: review of treatments including PRP

Result: PRP must be continued long term; cost estimates of $100-1,000 a month; contraindications include bleeding disorders and active infection.

Read the study ↗

Rossi A et al. Platelet-rich plasma treatment for endocrine-induced alopecia and persistent chemotherapy-induced alopecia in breast cancer survivors: a randomized, controlled, pilot study. Dermatol Surg. 2026

Design
rct
People
27
Who
breast cancer survivors with hair loss

Tested: PRP vs control, split-scalp

Result: Both sides gained density with no difference; circulating tumour cells were detected in the PRP in 2 of 12 assays, with no tumour seeding seen.

Read the study ↗

Bibi F et al. Reversible vision loss with pituitary microadenoma following PRP injection for hair growth: a rare case report and a mini-review of the literature. Clin Case Rep. 2025

Design
case report
People
1
Who
young woman

Tested: scalp PRP injection

Result: Reversible vision loss a month after PRP; causation unproven.

Read the study ↗

Landells I et al. A Canadian consensus on androgenetic alopecia. J Cutan Med Surg. 2025

Design
guideline
People
11
Who
11 Canadian physicians (Delphi consensus; some co-authors employed by L'Oreal Canada)

Tested: expert ratings of 17+ interventions

Result: Recommended oral and topical finasteride, oral dutasteride, minoxidil, PRP and microneedling; listed flutamide among interventions not recommended.

Read the study ↗