New: our own Hairmetry line. Every ingredient explained

Procedure

Microneedling for hair loss

Rolling or stamping fine needles into the scalp is a cheap add-on to minoxidil that helped in small trials, but it has not worked on its own and the largest trial found no extra benefit.

Not applicable Cost $ Safety: minor

hair lossthinningreceding hairline

Key takeaways

  • Microneedling is an add-on to minoxidil, not a treatment by itself. Meta-analyses of 10 to 13 randomized trials (466 to 696 people) found larger hair-count gains with microneedling plus topical minoxidil than with minoxidil alone (Abdi 2023; Pei 2024; Ahmed 2025).
  • The only randomized trial of microneedling alone (30 men, monthly sessions) found no gain in hair density (Kakizaki 2023).
  • The largest and most careful trial was negative. In 245 women with female pattern hair loss on 2% minoxidil, adding microneedling every 2 or 4 weeks for 24 weeks made no difference to the result (Liu 2026). It was open-label and used shallow needles, so it does not settle the question for men on 5% minoxidil.
  • The best-known positive trial is weaker than its headline. In 100 men over 12 weeks, weekly 1.5 mm rolling plus 5% minoxidil gained 91.4 hairs against 22.2 for minoxidil alone (Dhurat 2013). Patients were not blinded and no later trial has matched that effect size.
  • Deeper needles are not better. Pooled results showed no difference between needles of 1 mm or less and longer ones (Ahmed 2025), and in one trial 0.6 mm beat minoxidil alone while 1.2 mm did not clearly do so (Faghihi 2021).
  • It probably increases how much of an applied product is absorbed. Diastolic blood pressure fell after 0.5% minoxidil was microinfused into the scalp (Basilio 2025), and cosmetic serums applied after needling have caused foreign-body granulomas (Soltani-Arabshahi 2014).
  • Done cleanly it is usually safe, but home use has real failure modes, including a reported skull-level abscess after home dermarolling (Jain 2026).

What it is

A roller, stamp or motorized pen pushes many fine needles (0.25 to 2.5 mm in trials) into the scalp to make controlled micro-wounds. Variants include radiofrequency microneedling and microinfusion, where a tattoo-style machine drives a drug into the skin (Basilio 2025). Microinfusion overlaps with mesotherapy.

How it might work

These ideas are mostly unproven in people.

  • Wound-healing signals. Injury releases growth factors and may activate Wnt/beta-catenin signalling. Biopsies in one trial showed raised pathway markers after microneedling plus minoxidil (Bao 2022).
  • Better drug delivery. The needle channels cross the skin barrier, and the blood-pressure changes after microinfusion show minoxidil reaches the bloodstream (Basilio 2025).
  • Microneedling does not carry large proteins deeper. A histology study found no enhanced delivery of growth factors, which undercuts the common clinic pairing of microneedling with topical PRP or exosomes (Dhurat 2019).

What the studies show

  • Dhurat 2013, 100 men, 12 weeks: weekly 1.5 mm rolling plus 5% minoxidil gave +91.4 hairs against +22.2 for minoxidil alone, and 82% vs 4.5% rated themselves more than 50% better (Dhurat 2013).
  • Kumar 2018, 68 men: +12.52 vs +1.89 hairs per square inch, which the authors themselves called not cosmetically significant (Kumar 2018).
  • Bao 2020, 60 men, 24 weeks: density rose 18.8 per cm2 with minoxidil, 23.4 with microneedling, and 38.3 with both (Bao 2020).
  • Network meta-analysis, 27 trials and 1,110 people: minoxidil 5% plus microneedling ranked first, about 13 hairs per cm2 more than minoxidil alone (Gupta 2023).
  • Meta-analysis, 12 trials: hair-count effect size 1.32 but with very high heterogeneity (I2 of 88%), a sign that the trials disagree and may be biased (Ahmed 2025).
  • Liu 2026, 245 women, 24 weeks: no difference between 2% minoxidil alone and with microneedling at 0.5 to 0.55 mm (Liu 2026).
  • A 2025 Canadian expert consensus listed microneedling among 7 recommended interventions for pattern hair loss (Landells 2025).

How to read this: nearly all positive trials are small, single-centre, unblinded for patients and short (12 to 24 weeks), and their minoxidil-only groups often did worse than minoxidil does in its own large trials. That pattern fits bias in open-label add-on trials. The meta-analyses were published before the negative 2026 trial, so an updated pooled result would probably shrink the benefit.

How it's used in studies

Trials used needles of 0.6 to 1.5 mm, sessions from weekly to monthly, for 12 to 24 weeks, together with topical minoxidil. Dhurat 2013 needled weekly to mild redness, skipped minoxidil on the session day and restarted it 24 hours later (Dhurat 2013). Fortnightly and monthly sessions performed the same in the 2026 trial. Daily use has not been studied.

Side effects and safety

  • Common effects are temporary redness, pain and pinpoint bleeding. Active infection and metal allergy are listed risk factors, and darker skin types are more prone to dark marks after the skin heals (Chu 2021).
  • Serious events are rare and mostly case reports: an abscess under the scalp membrane with skull-bone infection after home dermarolling (Jain 2026), and a basal cell carcinoma at a hairline spot needled daily for 3 months, where causation is unproven (Aydemir 2026).
  • Only apply products made for use on broken skin after needling. Higher minoxidil absorption matters for anyone with low blood pressure or a heart condition.
  • Swelling, spreading pain, pus or fever after needling need prompt medical care.

Bottom line

Microneedling may add a little to minoxidil, but the evidence is mixed and the biggest trial found nothing extra. It should never replace minoxidil or finasteride. If you try it, use a clean single-use device, avoid needling over irritated or infected skin, and skip daily needling. Discuss with a doctor.

Studies 18

Dhurat R et al. A randomized evaluator blinded study of effect of microneedling in androgenetic alopecia: a pilot study. Int J Trichology. 2013

Design
rct
People
100
Duration
12 weeks
Who
men with androgenetic alopecia

Tested: weekly 1.5 mm microneedling plus 5% minoxidil vs 5% minoxidil alone

Result: Hair count rose by 91.4 vs 22.2; 82% vs 4.5% rated themselves more than 50% better. Patients were not blinded.

Read the study ↗

Kumar MK et al. A randomized controlled, single-observer blinded study to determine the efficacy of topical minoxidil plus microneedling versus topical minoxidil alone in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2018

Design
rct
People
68
Who
men with androgenetic alopecia

Tested: weekly microneedling plus 5% minoxidil vs 5% minoxidil

Result: Hair count rose 12.52 vs 1.89 per square inch; the authors called the gain not cosmetically significant.

Read the study ↗

Bao L et al. Randomized trial of electrodynamic microneedle combined with 5% minoxidil topical solution for the treatment of Chinese male androgenetic alopecia. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2020

Design
rct
People
60
Duration
24 weeks
Who
Chinese men with androgenetic alopecia

Tested: electrodynamic microneedling every 2 weeks with or without 5% minoxidil, vs minoxidil

Result: Density rose 18.8 (minoxidil), 23.4 (microneedling) and 38.3 per cm2 (both).

Read the study ↗

Bao L et al. Randomized trial of electrodynamic microneedling combined with 5% minoxidil topical solution for treating androgenetic alopecia in Chinese males and molecular mechanistic study of the involvement of the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022

Design
rct
People
71
Who
Chinese men with androgenetic alopecia

Tested: microneedling every 3 weeks with or without 5% minoxidil

Result: The combination did best, and scalp biopsies showed raised Wnt pathway markers.

Read the study ↗

Faghihi G et al. Microneedling in androgenetic alopecia; comparing two different depths of microneedles. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021

Design
rct
People
60
Duration
12 weeks
Who
people with androgenetic alopecia

Tested: 0.6 mm vs 1.2 mm microneedling every 2 weeks plus 5% minoxidil vs minoxidil alone

Result: 0.6 mm beat minoxidil alone on hair count and thickness; 1.2 mm did not significantly beat it on count.

Read the study ↗

Kakizaki P et al. Efficacy and safety of scalp microneedling in male pattern hair loss. Skin Appendage Disord. 2023

Design
rct
People
30
Who
men with pattern hair loss

Tested: monthly microneedling alone, roller vs tattoo-cartridge device, 4 sessions

Result: No gain in hair density; biopsies showed new collagen.

Read the study ↗
Show 12 more studies

Liu Y et al. Microneedle frequency adjunct to 2% minoxidil in female androgenetic alopecia: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2026

Design
rct
People
245
Duration
24 weeks
Who
women with female pattern hair loss

Tested: 2% minoxidil alone or with 0.5-0.55 mm microneedling every 2 or 4 weeks

Result: All three groups improved by the same amount; microneedling added no benefit. Open-label.

Read the study ↗

Abdi P et al. Efficacy and safety of combinational therapy using topical minoxidil and microneedling for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dermatol Res. 2023

Design
meta analysis
People
466
Who
people with androgenetic alopecia (10 RCTs)

Tested: microneedling plus minoxidil vs minoxidil

Result: Hair count improved (standardised mean difference 1.76); hair diameter did not.

Read the study ↗

Gupta AK et al. Relative effects of minoxidil 5%, platelet-rich plasma, and microneedling in pattern hair loss: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Skin Appendage Disord. 2023

Design
meta analysis
People
1,110
Who
people with pattern hair loss (27 trials)

Tested: minoxidil, PRP, microneedling and combinations

Result: Minoxidil 5% plus microneedling ranked first, about 13 hairs per cm2 more than minoxidil alone.

Read the study ↗

Pei D et al. Efficacy and safety of combined microneedling therapy for androgenic alopecia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024

Design
meta analysis
People
696
Who
people with androgenetic alopecia (13 RCTs)

Tested: combined microneedling vs monotherapy

Result: Better density and diameter with combined therapy; adverse events did not differ.

Read the study ↗

Ahmed KMA et al. Evaluating the efficacy and safety of combined microneedling therapy versus topical minoxidil in androgenetic alopecia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dermatol Res. 2025

Design
meta analysis
People
631
Who
people with androgenetic alopecia (12 RCTs)

Tested: microneedling plus minoxidil vs minoxidil

Result: Hair count effect size 1.32 with very high heterogeneity (I2 88%); no effect of needle depth, duration or device.

Read the study ↗

Dhurat R et al. Mission impossible: dermal delivery of growth factors via microneedling. Dermatol Ther. 2019

Design
other
Who
skin histology study

Tested: microneedling followed by topical growth factors

Result: No enhanced penetration of growth factors into the dermis.

Read the study ↗

Basilio FMA et al. Blood pressure changes in patients after minoxidil microinfusion to treat female pattern alopecia: analysis of a randomized, single blinded, placebo controlled clinical trial. Arch Dermatol Res. 2025

Design
rct
Who
women with female pattern hair loss

Tested: scalp microinfusion of 0.5% minoxidil vs placebo

Result: Diastolic blood pressure fell after minoxidil microinfusion, showing systemic absorption.

Read the study ↗

Soltani-Arabshahi R et al. Facial allergic granulomatous reaction and systemic hypersensitivity associated with microneedle therapy for skin rejuvenation. JAMA Dermatol. 2014

Design
case series
Who
patients treated with microneedling and a cosmetic serum

Tested: microneedling with a cosmetic serum

Result: Foreign-body granulomas and hypersensitivity followed use of the serum.

Read the study ↗

Chu S et al. Safety profile for microneedling: a systematic review. Dermatol Surg. 2021

Design
systematic review
Who
people treated with microneedling

Tested: microneedling

Result: Common effects were redness, pain and pinpoint bleeding; infection, metal allergy and darker skin raise the risk of complications.

Read the study ↗

Jain R et al. Subpericranial and epidural abscess with skull osteomyelitis as a complication of microneedling for alopecia: a singular case report. Surg Neurol Int. 2026

Design
case report
People
1
Who
person with alopecia using home dermarolling

Tested: home microneedling

Result: Abscess under the scalp membrane with skull-bone infection.

Read the study ↗

Aydemir AT et al. Basal cell carcinoma arising at the site of repeated microneedling-induced microtrauma for androgenetic alopecia: a case report. Skin Appendage Disord. 2026

Design
case report
People
1
Who
person with androgenetic alopecia

Tested: daily microneedling for 3 months at one hairline spot

Result: A basal cell carcinoma arose at the needled site; causation is unproven.

Read the study ↗

Landells I et al. A Canadian consensus on androgenetic alopecia. J Cutan Med Surg. 2025

Design
guideline
People
11
Who
11 Canadian physicians (Delphi consensus; some co-authors employed by L'Oreal Canada)

Tested: expert ratings of 17+ interventions

Result: Recommended oral and topical finasteride, oral dutasteride, minoxidil, PRP and microneedling; listed flutamide among interventions not recommended.

Read the study ↗