New: our own Hairmetry line. Every ingredient explained

Topic

Hair by ancestry, what differs and what overlaps

Hair differs on average between populations in curl, width, density and surface lipids, but the overlap is large and the old three-box labels hide more than they show.

drynessbreakagefrizzpoor curl definitionlow volumehair loss

Key takeaways

  • Averages differ, distributions overlap. Almost every comparison is a difference in group means, and people from every group sit across the whole range Daniels 2023.
  • Inner structure is the same; geometry and surface differ. No difference in the fine structure of fibers was found among Caucasian, Asian and African samples, while fiber geometry, mechanics and water swelling did differ Franbourg 2003 (industry-funded).
  • Growth and density: in 2,249 non-balding adults aged 18-35 from 24 ethnic groups, African hair had lower density and slower growth, Asian hair a thicker diameter and faster growth, and Caucasian hair high total density Loussouarn 2016 (industry-funded). In 38 African-born adults, growth averaged 256 vs 396 micrometres/day in a Caucasian comparison group, and density 190 vs 227 hairs/cm2 Loussouarn 2001.
  • Curl is a spectrum, not a race. Eight curl groups across 22 countries showed regional tendencies, but no region maps onto a single type Loussouarn 2007.
  • African hair takes up and loses water differently. Lab studies from one group found more, and more disordered, cuticle lipids and faster water diffusion in African hair, while Asian hair was most resistant to hydration changes Marti 2016, Oliver 2020, Barba 2022.
  • Curly hair breaks differently. A 2005 industry survey reported that 96% of African-American women experienced breakage. The authors attribute it to fiber structure plus grooming stress, not different chemistry Camacho-Bragado 2015.
  • Tight curl may have an upside. On a thermal manikin, tightly curled wigs let in the least solar heat to the scalp Lasisi 2023. That is a physics experiment, not a health outcome.
  • Most published work comes from cosmetics companies, mainly L'Oreal. That does not make it wrong, but the questions asked were product-driven.

Group averages (indicative, not rules)

Trait Lower or smaller Higher or larger Key studies
Density (hairs/cm2) African ancestry European ancestry Loussouarn 2016, Loussouarn 2001
Growth rate African Asian and European faster Loussouarn 2016
Strand width European Asian thickest Loussouarn 2016
Cuticle lipid amount Asian very low African higher Oliver 2020, Marti 2016
Water diffusion Asian and Caucasian lower African higher Oliver 2020

More numbers are in hair density and strand thickness.

Why "three races" fails

A critical appraisal argued that reported differences are real on average but overlap heavily, and that hair type classification should be built on measured fiber properties rather than ancestry labels Daniels 2023. Hairs from one person have been found to span two or three curl classes, and a study of curl grouping found six groups more reliable than eight Mkentane 2017. A 2026 systematic review of high-curl classification reviews four systems and notes their reliance on ancestry labels Callender 2026. See hair typing systems.

Lipids and moisture

The idea that African hair is simply "dry" has a nuance. Lab work found more total extractable lipid in African hair, some of it possibly external sebum, and more disordered cuticle lipids. That goes with higher water permeability and less radial swelling Marti 2016, Barba 2022. Removing apolar lipids reduced permeability and raised strength in the African fibers tested Marti 2016. Dryness in tight curls also reflects slow sebum travel along a coiled shaft; see sebum and scalp types.

Breakage and tension

The survey and crack-propagation work point to mechanical stress as the main driver of breakage, not chemistry Camacho-Bragado 2015. Tension from tight styles is a separate risk; see traction and hairstyles.

What it means for your hair

  • Use ancestry as a loose prior, then look at your own hair. Curl, thickness, density and porosity are better guides than a group label.
  • Thickness and density are best judged relative to people with similar hair. A "medium" strand in a group with thick average hair may feel fine to someone else.
  • Tightly coiled hair (4A-4C): put friction reduction first, detangle in sections on wet conditioned hair, and choose tension-free styles. Breakage, not slow growth, is often why length is not kept; that is an inference from the breakage work.
  • Thick but sparse-looking straight hair can mask early thinning at the part; see hair density.
  • Mixed ancestry: expect different patterns across the head, and note your main type plus its range.

Myths and facts

  • "Asian, Black and white hair have different keratin." No: the inner structure is the same Franbourg 2003. Shape, lipids and surface differ.
  • "Black hair grows slower." Lab growth studies found a slower average rate in African hair Loussouarn 2001, Loussouarn 2016, but length retention is also limited by breakage, and the two are often confused.
  • "Mixed-ancestry hair is a blend." The traits involve many genes and can differ along the head. Little research addresses mixed ancestry in depth.

Bottom line

Group averages are real but weak predictors for any one person. Internal fiber structure is shared; shape, lipids, density and growth differ on average. Judge your own hair by what it does, handle curls gently, and read the industry-heavy literature with that funding in mind.

Studies 12

Loussouarn G et al. Diversity in human hair growth, diameter, colour and shape. An in vivo study on young adults from 24 different ethnic groups observed in the five continents. Eur J Dermatol. 2016

Design
other
People
2,249

Result: In non-balding adults aged 18-35 from 24 ethnic groups, African hair had lower density and slower growth, Asian hair a thicker diameter and faster growth, and Caucasian hair high total density.

Read the study ↗

Loussouarn G. African hair growth parameters. Br J Dermatol. 2001

Design
other
People
38

Result: African-born adults grew hair 256 micrometres/day versus 396 in a Caucasian comparison group, with density 190 versus 227 hairs/cm2.

Read the study ↗

Franbourg A et al. Current research on ethnic hair. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003

Design
review

Result: No difference in the fine structure of Caucasian, Asian and African fibers, while geometry, mechanics and water swelling differed.

Read the study ↗

Marti M et al. The influence of hair lipids in ethnic hair properties. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2016

Design
other

Result: African hair had more, and more disordered, cuticle lipids and higher water permeability; removing apolar lipids reduced permeability and raised strength in the African fibers tested.

Read the study ↗

Oliver MA et al. Ethnic hair: thermoanalytical and spectroscopic differences. Skin Res Technol. 2020

Design
other

Result: East Asian hair resisted hydration changes most and had very low cuticle lipids, European hair took up the most water, and African hair had the fastest water diffusion.

Read the study ↗

Barba C et al. Lipid distribution on ethnic hairs by FTIR synchrotron spectroscopy. Skin Res Technol. 2022

Design
other

Result: Lipid distribution differed between Asian, African and Caucasian hair, with more disordered cuticle lipids in African hair.

Read the study ↗
Show 6 more studies

Camacho-Bragado GA, et al. Understanding breakage in curly hair. Br J Dermatol. 2015

Design
other
People
1

Result: In curly hair from one donor, cracks started at the cuticle-cortex junction and grew under grooming stress until the fiber snapped; a 2005 survey found 96% of African-American women reported breakage.

Read the study ↗

Lasisi T et al. Human scalp hair as a thermoregulatory adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2023

Design
other

Result: On a thermal manikin, tightly curled wigs let in the least solar heat to the scalp.

Read the study ↗

Daniels G, Fraser A, Westgate GE. How different is human hair? A critical appraisal… Int J Cosmet Sci. 2023

Design
review

Result: Reported differences in hair between populations are real on average but overlap heavily; classification should be built on measured fiber properties rather than ancestry labels.

Read the study ↗

Loussouarn G et al. Worldwide diversity of hair curliness: a new method of assessment. Int J Dermatol. 2007

Design
other
People
2,449

Result: Eight curl groups across 22 countries showed regional tendencies, but no region mapped onto a single type.

Read the study ↗

Mkentane K et al. Geometric classification of scalp hair for valid drug testing, 6 more reliable than 8 hair curl groups. PLoS One. 2017

Design
other
People
48

Result: Trained raters agreed only modestly on 8 curl groups (kappa 0.38-0.46) and better on 6 groups (0.61-0.73); no person's 10 sampled hairs fell into one class.

Read the study ↗

Callender V et al. Classification of high curl pattern hair: a systematic review and clinical perspective. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2026

Design
systematic review

Result: Four curl classification systems exist; the Walker chart was built to market products and none has strong validation.

Read the study ↗