New: our own Hairmetry line. Every ingredient explained

Procedure

Hair cloning and follicle regeneration

True hair cloning is not available anywhere; the nearest real thing is injecting your own cultured follicle cells, which shows modest, temporary gains in early Japanese trials.

Investigational, in trials Cost varies Safety: moderate

hair lossthinningreceding hairline

Key takeaways

  • True cloning does not exist as a treatment. A 2026 review of regeneration science says robust therapeutics to regenerate human follicles have yet to be identified, and surveys organoids, 3D printing and hair-on-chip models as research platforms (Ahmed 2026). Treat clinic offers of hair cloning or multiplication as marketing.
  • The leading human approach injects cultured dermal sheath cup cells. Cells are taken from donor-area follicles, grown, and injected into thinning scalp. In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind dose-finding study (50 men, 15 women), the lowest dose tested (3.0 x 10^5 cells) raised total hair density and cumulative diameter versus placebo at 6 and 9 months, but the effect was temporary and no lower doses were tested (Tsuboi 2020).
  • A follow-up single-arm study was modest. In 36 people given two injections 3 months apart, 30% improved on blinded photographs and mean hair diameter rose about 2.2%. Benefit was greater in women and in people with more terminal hairs (Harada 2023). The authors are the developers.
  • It is hard because cultured human dermal papilla cells lose their hair-inducing ability. In lab work, electrical stimulation partly restored it in mouse transplants, but that is preclinical (Yan 2022).
  • Fat-derived and stem cell injections are a separate and thinner field: a 2026 systematic review of 20 clinical studies (724 patients) found promising but low-certainty results (Behrangi 2026). See stem cell and growth factor treatments and exosomes.

What it is

A hair transplant moves a fixed supply of donor follicles from the back of the head (see hair transplant). Hair cloning aims to multiply them. Rodent cells can induce new follicles, but cultured human cells largely cannot, so multiplication has stalled at the preclinical stage. Cell therapy with dermal sheath cup cells does not create new follicles; it appears to nudge existing miniaturized ones.

What the studies show

  • Tsuboi 2020, 65 people: lowest dose beat placebo at 6 and 9 months, but temporarily (Tsuboi 2020).
  • Harada 2023, 36 people: 30% improved on photos; diameter +2.2% (Harada 2023).
  • Women responded at least as well as men in these studies, unlike most hair treatments.
  • No cloned or cultured-cell hair product is known to be approved by the FDA, EMA or MHRA for hair loss. Some clinics abroad sell unapproved stem cell treatments that can carry infection and injection risks.

How it's used in studies

Donor-area follicle cells were cultured and injected into the thinning scalp, in the Harada study as two injections 3 months apart. It targets pattern loss with surviving miniaturized hairs, not fully bald or scarred skin.

Bottom line

Hair cloning is not available. Proven options remain minoxidil, finasteride, light therapy and transplant (see the treatment ladder). Ask any clinic selling cloning or multiplication for peer-reviewed human data and regulatory status, or look for registered clinical trials instead. Discuss with a doctor.

Studies 6

Tsuboi R et al. Autologous cell-based therapy for male and female pattern hair loss using dermal sheath cup cells: a randomized placebo-controlled double-blinded dose-finding clinical study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020

Design
rct
People
65
Duration
9 months
Who
50 men and 15 women with pattern hair loss

Tested: injected cultured dermal sheath cup cells, lowest dose 3.0 x 10^5 cells, vs placebo

Result: Lowest dose raised total hair density and cumulative diameter vs placebo at 6 and 9 months; effect was temporary.

Read the study ↗

Harada K et al. Efficacy of autologous dermal sheath cup cell transplantation in male and female pattern hair loss: a single-arm, multi-center, phase III equivalent clinical study. J Dermatol. 2023

Design
other
People
36
Who
men and women with pattern hair loss

Tested: two injections of dermal sheath cup cells 3 months apart

Result: 30% improved on blinded photographs; mean hair diameter rose about 2.2%; greater benefit in women.

Read the study ↗

Ahmed IA, Shafiee A. Human hair regeneration using organoids and hair-on-chip technologies. Lab Chip. 2026

Design
review
Who
research platforms

Tested: organoids, 3D printing and hair-on-chip models

Result: Robust therapeutics to regenerate human follicles have yet to be identified.

Read the study ↗

Behrangi E et al. A systematic review of clinical evidence on the efficacy and safety of conditioned media, platelet-rich fibrin, stromal vascular fraction, extracellular vesicles, and stem cells in androgenetic alopecia. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2026

Design
systematic review
People
724
Who
patients with androgenetic alopecia (20 studies)

Tested: conditioned media, PRF, SVF, extracellular vesicles, stem cells

Result: Benefit in all categories with mild adverse events, but heterogeneous with limited follow-up; vesicles gave hair count +28% in 3 studies (89 patients).

Read the study ↗

Kang BY et al. The safety and efficacy of autologous adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction for nonscarring alopecia: a systematic review. Arch Dermatol Res. 2022

Design
systematic review
People
188
Who
people with nonscarring alopecia (6 studies, 3 RCTs)

Tested: autologous stromal vascular fraction

Result: Density improved versus control or baseline with no severe adverse events.

Read the study ↗

Yan L et al. Electrical stimulation to human dermal papilla cells for hair regenerative medicine. J Biosci Bioeng. 2022

Design
in vitro
Who
human dermal papilla cells and a mouse transplant model

Tested: electrical stimulation

Result: Raised hair-related gene expression; stimulated cells made twice the hair in mouse transplants.

Read the study ↗