New: our own Hairmetry line. Every ingredient explained

Topic

Shampoo types and how to choose

Shampoo types are marketing labels built from the same few parts, so choose by your scalp problem first and your hair type second.

oily scalpdry scalpdandruffdrynessbuildupfrizzpoor curl definitionhard water

Key takeaways

  • Shampoo "types" are marketing categories built from the same few parts: a primary cleanser, secondary surfactants, conditioning agents and optional actives. A shampoo's strength and mildness depend on the whole blend, not a single label word (see how shampoo works).
  • The most important choice is whether you have a scalp problem. For flakes and itch, use an anti-dandruff shampoo with a proven active (ketoconazole, zinc pyrithione, selenium sulfide, piroctone olamine). These are the only shampoo categories with strong controlled-trial evidence.
  • "Sulfate-free" is not a quality grade. Sulfate-free shampoos can be mild (isethionates, glutamates, glucosides) or strong (olefin sulfonates), and sulfates mixed with amphoterics can be mild. A review of the "no sulfates, no parabens, no-poo" trend urges clinicians to answer patient concerns with facts rather than fads (Cline 2018). We found no head-to-head wear trial of sulfate versus sulfate-free shampoo on hair.
  • Cleansing conditioners (co-washes) are gentle but can build up. A review describes co-washing as conditioner-based cleansing without silicones, petrolatum or mineral oil, gentle to hair but prone to leaving residue under the cuticle (Gavazzoni Dias 2019). In a double-blind trial of 200 volunteers, one cleansing conditioner was as well tolerated as three others and better tolerated than two controls (Warshaw 2020). The trial measured tolerability, not cleaning.
  • Clarifying and chelating shampoos are for periodic use against styling-product buildup, hard-water minerals or swimming. See hard water and hair and citric acid.
  • Bar shampoos vary hugely. Syndet bars (isethionate-based) are mild; true soap bars are alkaline (see shampoo pH).
  • Apple cider vinegar and "no-poo" methods have no trial support for scalp or hair health (Cline 2018; Ogah 2025).
  • Scalp scrubs have only manufacturer-linked, uncontrolled data: 29 participants, with 61% improvement in adherent flaking by day 15 (Patel 2024). Do not scrub irritated or dandruff skin, where the barrier is already weak (Harding 2002).

The main categories

Type What defines it Evidence Best fit
Standard / sulfate SLES or SLS primary with an amphoteric such as CAPB Strong cleaning of sebum; mildness depends on the blend (D'Souza 2015; Thompson 2023) Oily scalp, product buildup, fine straight hair
Sulfate-free Mild anionic (isethionate, glutamate, glycinate, sulfosuccinate) or sulfonate primary Skin mildness data for individual surfactants (Corazza 2010; Ghosh 2007); no hair wear trials Dry, curly, coloured or sensitive scalps; check for olefin sulfonate
Anti-dandruff Ketoconazole, zinc pyrithione, selenium sulfide, piroctone, ciclopirox, salicylic acid, tar Multiple randomized trials (see the molecule pages) Flaky or itchy scalp
Moisturising Mild surfactant plus emollients and conditioning polymers Mechanism; little independent data Dry, textured hair with oilier roots
Clarifying Strong cleanser, sometimes with chelators Mechanism; deposits are well documented Occasional reset
Chelating EDTA, citric acid, phytate, GLDA Lab studies on calcium removal (Zhang 2025) Hard-water areas, swimmers
Co-wash / cleansing conditioner Cationic conditioning agents, little or no anionic Tolerability trial and a pros-and-cons review Very dry, coily, high-porosity hair
Bond-building / "repair" Actives from bond builders See that page Damaged hair
Scalp scrubs Physical or chemical exfoliants Manufacturer-linked pilot only Buildup on non-inflamed scalps, sparingly

2-in-1 and silicone shampoos

Anti-dandruff shampoos with conditioning silicones were designed so people do not abandon them for poor feel. A zinc pyrithione plus climbazole plus silicone formula deposited silicone smoothly on virgin and damaged hair and kept its anti-dandruff effect when users switched back (Unilever study, Turner 2013). The trade-off is possible residue on fine hair.

Low-poo, no-poo and sulfate-free

The 2018 review of the "no-poo" method frames it as a patient-driven movement and gives no outcome data (Cline 2018). Whether sulfates are inherently harmful is covered on the SLS and SLES pages: SLS is a genuine irritant in lab tests, SLES is milder, and blends differ.

What it means by hair profile

  • Oily scalp, fine and straight (1A-2B), low density: a standard or lightly clarifying shampoo two to four times a week; skip heavy 2-in-1s.
  • Dry, flaky or itchy scalp: an anti-dandruff active first; see dandruff.
  • Wavy to coily (2C-4C): scalp cleansing needs are real but lengths are dry. Use a mild shampoo on the scalp only, about weekly for coily textures (see washing frequency), and co-wash between washes if buildup is not an issue.
  • High porosity or coloured hair: milder surfactants and acidic conditioning (see shampoo pH).
  • Hard-water areas: an occasional chelating shampoo.
  • Thinning hair: any gentle shampoo that does not irritate the scalp; ketoconazole is an optional add-on.

Myths and facts

  • Myth: sulfates damage hair. Fact: anionics extract more hair lipid than non-ionics in lab tests (Shaw 1979), but washing frequency and conditioning dominate real-world outcomes.
  • Myth: sulfate-free shampoos clean poorly. Fact: some clean strongly, such as olefin sulfonates.
  • Myth: co-washing is shampoo-free cleaning. Fact: it cleans little and can build up residue.
  • Myth: an apple cider vinegar rinse balances scalp pH. Fact: there are no trial data.
  • Myth: scrubbing removes scalp "toxins". Fact: there are no data.

Bottom line

Pick the category by scalp problem first and hair type second. Use one anti-dandruff shampoo on the scalp if you have flakes, and a plain mild shampoo otherwise. Use a clarifying or chelating shampoo only every few weeks. Co-wash only if your hair is very dry and you also shampoo regularly. Patch-test any new "natural" product if your scalp is sensitive.

Studies 14

Cline A, Uwakwe LN, McMichael AJ. No sulfates, no parabens, and the 'no-poo' method: a new patient perspective on common shampoo ingredients. Cutis. 2018

Design
review

Result: Frames the no-sulfate, no-paraben and no-poo trends as patient-driven and urges dermatologists to address them with facts; no outcome data.

Read the study ↗

Gavazzoni Dias MFR. Pro and Contra of Cleansing Conditioners. Skin Appendage Disord. 2019

Design
review

Result: Co-washing is gentle to hair but prone to residue under the cuticle.

Read the study ↗

Warshaw EM et al. Tolerability of hair cleansing conditioners: a double-blind randomized, controlled trial designed to evaluate consumer complaints to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2020

Design
rct
People
200
Who
volunteers

Tested: cleansing conditioners versus controls

Result: One cleansing conditioner was as well tolerated as three others and better tolerated than two controls. Tolerability was the endpoint, not cleaning.

Read the study ↗

Fung ES et al. Tier-based skin irritation testing of hair cleansing conditioners and their constituents. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2019

Design
other

Result: Tiered skin irritation testing of cleansing conditioners and their ingredients.

Read the study ↗

Patel MN et al. Hydroxy acid scrub plus copper tripeptide serum in seborrheic dermatitis. Cureus. 2024

Design
other
Who
people with scalp seborrheic dermatitis

Tested: hydroxy acid scrub plus copper tripeptide serum

Result: Reported on a scalp regimen for seborrheic dermatitis; it does not test hair growth.

Read the study ↗

Turner GA et al. Enhanced efficacy and sensory properties of an anti-dandruff shampoo containing zinc pyrithione and climbazole. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2013

Design
other

Tested: zinc pyrithione plus climbazole plus silicone shampoo

Result: Silicone deposited smoothly on virgin and damaged hair and the shampoo kept its anti-dandruff effect when users reverted. Unilever study; also notes dandruff may affect up to half of people after puberty.

Read the study ↗
Show 8 more studies

Corazza M et al. Irritant and sensitizing potential of eight surfactants commonly used in skin cleansers: an evaluation of 105 patients. Dermatitis. 2010

Design
other
People
105
Who
Italian patients patch-tested

Tested: eight cleansing surfactants

Result: None caused irritation at the tested dilution; best tolerated were sodium cocoyl glutamate, sodium lauroyl oat amino acids and disodium cocoamphodiacetate.

Read the study ↗

Ghosh S, Blankschtein D. Why is sodium cocoyl isethionate (SCI) mild to the skin barrier? An in vitro investigation based on the relative sizes of the SCI micelles and the skin aqueous pores. J Cosmet Sci. 2007

Design
in vitro

Result: Sodium cocoyl isethionate forms micelles of about 33.5 angstroms, larger than skin aqueous pores (about 29 angstroms), which the authors proposed explains its mildness.

Read the study ↗

Shaw DA. Hair lipid and surfactants. Extraction of lipid by surfactants and lack of effect of shampooing on rate of re-fatting of hair. Int J Cosmet Sci. 1979

Design
other

Result: Changing shampoo frequency from once to three times a week had no significant effect on how fast hair re-fatted.

Read the study ↗

D'Souza P, Rathi SK. Shampoo and Conditioners: What a Dermatologist Should Know? Indian J Dermatol. 2015

Design
review

Result: Dermatology review of shampoo and conditioner ingredients: foam does not equal cleaning, non-ionics are the mildest and weakest cleansers, and saponin-based natural cleansers lather but clean poorly.

Read the study ↗

Zhang D et al. Reinforcing chemically treated human hair with citric acid. 2025

Design
in vitro
Who
chemically treated human hair

Tested: citric acid treatment

Result: Citric acid reduced calcium in chemically treated hair by 21-42% and improved mechanical properties.

Read the study ↗

Harding CR, et al

Design
other

Result: Dandruff scalps had much lower barrier lipids (ceramides, fatty acids, cholesterol) than non-dandruff scalps in UK and Thai samples.

Read the study ↗

Ogah O et al. Assessing the Merit of the Apple Cider Vinegar Rinse Method for Synthetic Hair Extensions. 2025

Design
review

Result: Found essentially no data supporting apple cider vinegar rinses; the work concerned synthetic hair extensions.

Read the study ↗

Thompson CJ, Ainger N, Starck P, Mykhaylyk OO, Ryan AJ. Shampoo Science: A Review of the Physiochemical Processes behind the Function of a Shampoo. Macromol Chem Phys. 2023

Design
review

Result: Reviews how surfactants lift soil from hair (roll-up, emulsification, solubilization), why shampoos pair a primary anionic with an amphoteric co-surfactant, and states that foaming does not affect cleaning. Two authors were from Unilever R&D.

Read the study ↗