Encyclopedia · surfactant
Sodium laureth sulfate
The workhorse cleanser of mainstream shampoos, SLS with a short ethylene-oxide chain added, which keeps most of the cleaning and foam and is gentler, with a trace by-product called 1,4-dioxane.
What it is
Sodium laureth sulfate (SLES) is lauryl alcohol that has been ethoxylated (typically 1-3 ethylene-oxide units, written SLE1S, SLE2S, SLE3S) and then sulfated. It belongs to the salts of sulfated ethoxylated alcohols reviewed by the Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) (Robinson 2010). Sulfate surfactants such as SLS and SLES are the most common primary surfactants in shampoo and remain unmatched for performance at low cost (Thompson 2023).
How it works
- It cleans by the same anionic mechanisms as SLS (see how shampoo works).
- Why it is milder than SLS: added ethoxylate groups increase skin mildness, though they also make the formula harder to thicken because worm-like micelles form less readily (Thompson 2023).
- In most shampoos it is paired with an amphoteric co-surfactant such as cocamidopropyl betaine, which further lowers irritation (Thompson 2023; Morris 2021).
- Procter & Gamble has used SLE1S as the anionic partner in a fatty-alcohol gel-network shampoo that delivered cetyl and stearyl alcohol into hair in vitro (Marsh 2017).
What the studies show
- A CIR amended safety assessment found SLES and ammonium laureth sulfate caused no adverse responses in toxicology testing other than irritation. They are dermal and eye irritants but not sensitizers, and are safe when formulated to be non-irritating (Robinson 2010).
- Cell assays and 24-hour human patch tests of SLES and alternative blends ranked mildness in opposite orders for some blends (Chen 2026).
- In vitro, 15 anionic systems on human skin showed penetration tracked the micelle threshold and zeta potential, not micelle size (Morris 2019).
- US FDA data on 1,4-dioxane surveys show average levels in cosmetics fell from 50 ppm in 1981 to 19 ppm in 1997. In 2008 about 80% of products had none detected (limit 1 ppm) and the maximum was 11.6 ppm (FDA).
How it's used in studies
SLES is the primary surfactant in shampoos at up to about 10%, combined with 1-5% of an amphoteric co-surfactant (Thompson 2023).
Side effects and safety
- Irritation is possible and depends on concentration. It is generally lower than SLS and reduced further in blends. It is not a sensitizer (Robinson 2010).
- 1,4-dioxane is a by-product of ethoxylation, not an ingredient. The US FDA notes the National Toxicology Program considers it reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen, that the EU's scientific committee considers trace levels of 10 ppm or less safe, and that levels have fallen sharply since the 1980s because of vacuum stripping. FDA has set no federal limit. New York State caps personal care products, including shampoo, at 1 ppm from the end of 2023. Ingredients with "-eth-", "PEG" or "polyoxyethylene" in the name can carry it (FDA).
- It is a permitted cosmetic ingredient without a specific concentration cap in the US, EU and UK.
Bottom line
SLES is a reasonable default cleanser for most scalps, especially oily or product-heavy ones, and it is the base of most budget shampoos. It is gentler than SLS, and much of the "sulfates are harsh" reputation comes from SLS-heavy formulas or from people with sensitive skin. People with eczema-prone or very sensitive scalps, dry curly or coily hair, or freshly coloured hair may prefer milder primaries such as isethionates or amino-acid surfactants. The 1,4-dioxane concern is real but small at current levels. We are fairly sure of the irritation and safety profile, but no trial has tested hair outcomes: none shows SLES shampoos cause more breakage, colour loss or hair loss than sulfate-free shampoos.
Studies 7
Robinson VC et al. Final report of the amended safety assessment of sodium laureth sulfate and related salts of sulfated ethoxylated alcohols. Int J Toxicol. 2010
Result: Sodium and ammonium laureth sulfate caused no adverse responses in toxicology testing other than irritation; dermal and eye irritants but not sensitizers; safe when formulated to be non-irritating.
Read the study ↗Thompson CJ, Ainger N, Starck P, Mykhaylyk OO, Ryan AJ. Shampoo Science: A Review of the Physiochemical Processes behind the Function of a Shampoo. Macromol Chem Phys. 2023
Result: Reviews how surfactants lift soil from hair (roll-up, emulsification, solubilization), why shampoos pair a primary anionic with an amphoteric co-surfactant, and states that foaming does not affect cleaning. Two authors were from Unilever R&D.
Read the study ↗Chen M et al. Revealing the discrepancy between in vitro and in vivo mildness of surfactant systems: mechanistic insights from physicochemical and structural analyses. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2026
Result: Cell assays ranked a betaine blend as milder, but 24-hour human patch tests showed the opposite; larger aggregates were linked to more irritation under prolonged covered contact. Authors were from a cosmetics company.
Read the study ↗Morris SAV et al. Mechanisms of anionic surfactant penetration into human skin: Investigating monomer, micelle and submicellar aggregate penetration theories. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2019
Tested: 16 surfactant systems
Result: Penetration tracked critical micelle concentration and zeta potential (R2 = 0.76) but not micelle diameter (R2 = 0.12); authors proposed free surfactant drives short-term penetration and barrier damage drives longer-term penetration.
Read the study ↗Morris SAV et al. Surfactant Penetration into Human Skin from Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate and Lauramidopropyl Betaine Mixtures. Langmuir. 2021
Tested: SDS mixed with lauramidopropyl betaine
Result: SDS penetration fell log-linearly as the betaine fraction rose and tracked predicted free-surfactant concentration closely (R2 = 0.95).
Read the study ↗Marsh JM et al. Gel network shampoo formulation and hair health benefits. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2017
Result: A fatty-alcohol gel network in a shampoo delivered cetyl and stearyl alcohol into hair and improved fatigue resistance in lab testing. Procter & Gamble study.
Read the study ↗Show 1 more studies
US Food and Drug Administration. 1,4-Dioxane in Cosmetics: A Manufacturing Byproduct. Content current as of 2022-03-03
Result: Average 1,4-dioxane in surveyed cosmetics fell from 50 ppm (1981) to 19 ppm (1997); in 2008 about 80% of products had none detected (limit 1 ppm), maximum 11.6 ppm. Ingredients with -eth-, PEG or polyoxyethylene in the name can carry it; FDA has set no federal limit.
Read the study ↗Related
- Sodium lauryl sulfateA cheap, strong cleanser and foamer that removes oil very well but is the most irritating common shampoo surfactant, so dermatologists use it as their standard test irritant.
- Ammonium laureth sulfateThe ammonium-salt version of SLES, an ethoxylated sulfate cleanser that is gentler than lauryl sulfates and can carry a trace by-product called 1,4-dioxane.
- Cocamidopropyl betaineThe most common helper surfactant in shampoo, which makes sulfate cleansers gentler, thicker and foamier, and a rare cause of scalp allergy that usually comes from manufacturing impurities.
- Disodium laureth sulfosuccinateA mild anionic cleanser often used as a secondary or co-primary surfactant that helps blends stay gentle while still cleaning.
- How shampoo worksShampoo is water plus a blend of cleansing molecules that lift oil off your scalp and hair, and the blend matters far more than any single label word.