New: our own Hairmetry line. Every ingredient explained

Encyclopedia · surfactant

Ammonium laureth sulfate

The ammonium-salt version of SLES, an ethoxylated sulfate cleanser that is gentler than lauryl sulfates and can carry a trace by-product called 1,4-dioxane.

Cosmetic ingredient Cost $ Safety: minor

oily scalpbuildup

What it is

Ammonium laureth sulfate (ALES) is ethoxylated, sulfated lauryl alcohol neutralized with ammonia. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review assessed it together with SLES, most recently in an amended 2010 report on salts of sulfated ethoxylated alcohols (Robinson 2010). Dermatology reviews list the laureth sulfates (sodium, ammonium, triethanolamine) as good cleansers with good foam that suit normal-to-dry hair better than the lauryl sulfates (D'Souza 2015).

How it works

It cleans by the anionic mechanism described for sodium laureth sulfate. Ethoxylation adds mildness compared with lauryl sulfates (Thompson 2023). See how shampoo works.

What the studies show

  • Sodium and ammonium laureth sulfate caused no adverse responses in toxicology testing apart from irritation. They are safe when formulated to be non-irritating (Robinson 2010).
  • A dermatology review describes laureth sulfates as good cleansing and foam agents suited to normal-to-dry hair (D'Souza 2015).
  • US FDA notes ingredients with "-eth-" may carry the ethoxylation by-product 1,4-dioxane, and that levels have fallen over decades (FDA).

How it's used in studies

We found no clinical hair studies specific to ALES. It is used as a primary surfactant in the same way as SLES.

Side effects and safety

  • Irritation potential is similar to SLES, and the CIR did not find it to be a sensitizer (Robinson 2010).
  • 1,4-dioxane is a possible trace contaminant, as for SLES. New York State caps personal care products, including shampoo, at 1 ppm from the end of 2023.
  • It is a permitted cosmetic ingredient in the US, EU and UK.

Bottom line

Choose or avoid ALES on the same basis as SLES: an effective, moderately gentle cleanser for most scalps, less ideal for very sensitive scalps or dry, coily or freshly coloured hair. No ALES-specific hair data exist.

Studies 4

Robinson VC et al. Final report of the amended safety assessment of sodium laureth sulfate and related salts of sulfated ethoxylated alcohols. Int J Toxicol. 2010

Design
review

Result: Sodium and ammonium laureth sulfate caused no adverse responses in toxicology testing other than irritation; dermal and eye irritants but not sensitizers; safe when formulated to be non-irritating.

Read the study ↗

D'Souza P, Rathi SK. Shampoo and Conditioners: What a Dermatologist Should Know? Indian J Dermatol. 2015

Design
review

Result: Dermatology review of shampoo and conditioner ingredients: foam does not equal cleaning, non-ionics are the mildest and weakest cleansers, and saponin-based natural cleansers lather but clean poorly.

Read the study ↗

US Food and Drug Administration. 1,4-Dioxane in Cosmetics: A Manufacturing Byproduct. Content current as of 2022-03-03

Design
guideline

Result: Average 1,4-dioxane in surveyed cosmetics fell from 50 ppm (1981) to 19 ppm (1997); in 2008 about 80% of products had none detected (limit 1 ppm), maximum 11.6 ppm. Ingredients with -eth-, PEG or polyoxyethylene in the name can carry it; FDA has set no federal limit.

Read the study ↗

Thompson CJ, Ainger N, Starck P, Mykhaylyk OO, Ryan AJ. Shampoo Science: A Review of the Physiochemical Processes behind the Function of a Shampoo. Macromol Chem Phys. 2023

Design
review

Result: Reviews how surfactants lift soil from hair (roll-up, emulsification, solubilization), why shampoos pair a primary anionic with an amphoteric co-surfactant, and states that foaming does not affect cleaning. Two authors were from Unilever R&D.

Read the study ↗