New: our own Hairmetry line. Every ingredient explained

Encyclopedia · supplement

Marine protein supplements (Viviscal, Nourkrin)

Branded fish- and shellfish-extract pills with positive but small, manufacturer-linked trials.

Supplement Cost $$$ Safety: minor

hair lossthinningshedding

What it is

Supplements built on proprietary fish or shellfish extracts, with added vitamins and minerals.

How it works

The makers claim the extracts feed follicles with protein-like building blocks. No mechanism has been demonstrated in people.

What the studies show

  • ViviScal, 1992, 40 young men with pattern loss over 6 months: non-vellus hair rose 38% versus 2%. The authors claimed a 95% clinical and histological cure, most had used minoxidil, an erratum was issued, and the effect is implausibly large. Lassus 1992
  • Nourkrin, 2006, 55 people over 6 months: a significant positive effect on objective hair growth across causes of hair loss. The abstract gives no numbers. Thom 2006
  • Viviscal Extra Strength, 2015, 60 women with self-perceived thinning over 90 days: more terminal hairs (p<0.0001) and less shedding (p=0.002) than placebo. Industry-linked. Ablon 2015
  • A systematic review of 30 studies put Viviscal and Nourkrin among supplements with the best, still limited, evidence. Drake 2023
  • A meta-analysis of 14 studies (967 people) found pooled benefit for telogen and anagen density but not total hair count. Alanazi 2026

Side effects and safety

Not suitable with fish or shellfish allergy. Usually the most expensive supplement category, about $50 or more a month.

Bottom line

The best-evidenced of the hair vitamins, but with consistent industry ties and no head-to-head test against minoxidil. A fair add-on with realistic expectations, not a replacement for proven treatments. See hair supplement blends. Discuss with a doctor.

Studies 5

Lassus A et al. A comparative study of a new food supplement, ViviScal, with fish extract for the treatment of hereditary androgenic alopecia in young males. 1992

Design
rct
People
40
Duration
6 months
Who
young men with androgenetic alopecia

Tested: ViviScal vs fish extract

Result: Non-vellus hair rose 38% vs 2%; authors claimed 95% cure; most had used minoxidil; an erratum was issued.

Read the study ↗

Thom E et al. Nourkrin: objective and subjective effects and tolerability in persons with hair loss. 2006

Design
rct
People
55
Duration
6 months
Who
people with hair loss

Tested: Nourkrin vs placebo

Result: Significant positive effect on objective hair growth; abstract gives no numbers.

Read the study ↗

Ablon G et al. A 3-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the ability of an extra-strength marine protein supplement to promote hair growth and decrease shedding in women with self-perceived thinning hair. 2015

Design
rct
People
60
Duration
90 days
Who
women with self-perceived thinning

Tested: Viviscal Extra Strength vs placebo

Result: More terminal hairs (p<0.0001) and less shedding (p=0.002) than placebo; industry-linked product.

Read the study ↗

Drake L et al. Nutritional supplements for hair loss: a systematic review. JAMA Dermatol. 2023

Design
systematic review
People
30
Who
30 studies of supplements for hair loss

Tested: oral supplements including apple nutraceutical and capsaicin-isoflavone

Result: Apple nutraceutical and capsaicin-isoflavone were among the supplements with higher-quality evidence; adverse effects were rare and mild.

Read the study ↗

Alanazi R et al. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Commercial Oral Supplements for Hair Growth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 2026

Design
meta analysis
People
967
Who
people in 14 commercial hair-supplement studies

Tested: oral hair supplements vs placebo

Result: Gains in anagen density, less telogen and more hairs on pull test; total hair count not significant (p=0.06).

Read the study ↗