Encyclopedia · growth stimulant
Bimatoprost
A prostaglandin-like eye medicine that grows longer, thicker, darker eyelashes (and helps eyebrows), but did not work on the scalp.
What it is
Bimatoprost is a synthetic relative of prostaglandin F2-alpha. It was first a glaucoma eye drop (Lumigan), and glaucoma patients noticed their lashes growing. As Latisse (0.03%) it was approved by the US FDA in December 2008 for eyelash hypotrichosis (too few or too short lashes). It is applied along the upper eyelid margin, not dropped into the eye (label).
- US: prescription-only, approved for lashes. Not approved for brows or scalp.
- Japan: marketed for lash hypotrichosis as Glash Vista.
- UK and EU: licensed for glaucoma. Lash use is off-label and by prescription; we found no EU authorisation for a lash indication.
Cosmetic lash serums are a different matter. Some contain bimatoprost or related drugs without declaring it: of 64 serums bought online in Japan, 4 contained bimatoprost (3 not on the label) and 8 contained other prostaglandin analogues (Rahman 2022).
How it works
Bimatoprost prolongs the growth phase of the lash follicle, so more lashes are growing at any moment, and it enlarges the follicle bulb and adds pigment, giving longer, thicker, darker lashes. In mice it lengthened the growth phase but did not create new follicles.
Scalp follicles respond in the lab: bimatoprost increased hair production in cultured human scalp follicles and sped regrowth in mice (one co-author worked for the manufacturer) (Khidhir 2013). A 2026 study of 11 men found 1% to 3% scalp formulations reached at least 10 times the concentration needed for maximal growth in isolated follicles, so poor penetration is probably not why the scalp trials disappointed (Khajeh Pour 2026). In alopecia totalis and universalis it lengthened existing lashes but grew no new ones (Ricar 2022).
What the studies show
Eyelashes (strong evidence)
- In 278 adults over 16 weeks, 78.1% had at least a 1-grade improvement in lash prominence versus 18.4% on vehicle; length, thickness and darkness all improved (Smith 2012).
- Two Japanese trials found responders in 77.3% versus 17.6% (173 people, idiopathic) and 88.9% versus 27.8% (36 people, after chemotherapy) (Harii 2014).
- In 130 people after chemotherapy, responders were 46.9% versus 18.2% at month 6 and 61.5% at month 12 with continued use (Wirta 2015).
- In a 1-year trial, gains held about 2 months after stopping and largely faded by 4 to 6 months; composite responders at month 4 were 40.2% versus 6.8% (Glaser 2015).
- In 71 children and adolescents, 70.8% versus 26.1% improved, but the benefit was significant only in healthy adolescents, not after chemotherapy or in alopecia areata (Borchert 2016).
Eyebrows (fairly good evidence, off-label)
- In 357 adults over 7 months, at least a 1-grade improvement occurred in 83.9% (twice daily), 77.1% (once daily) and 43.0% (vehicle) (Carruthers 2016).
- A 40-person trial of 0.01% found density and hair diameter improved versus vehicle (P<0.001) (Suchonwanit 2019).
- In 60 people, bimatoprost 0.01%, 0.03% and 2% minoxidil gel all improved the brows with no significant difference between them, so minoxidil is a cheaper option (Zaky 2023).
Scalp pattern hair loss (no benefit shown)
- In 307 men over 6 months, three bimatoprost formulations changed hair count by +13.1, +6.1 and +6.3 hairs/cm2 versus +4.1 on vehicle and +21.9 on minoxidil 5% (men's trial).
- In 306 women, bimatoprost changed it by -0.4, -3.5 and +4.3 versus +1.1 on vehicle and +13.6 on minoxidil 2% (women's trial).
- A second men's program (244 men) found +12.7 and +9.3 versus +5.8 on vehicle (trial record).
- These results were posted only on the trial registry, no phase 3 was registered, and the one meta-analysis of prostaglandins for hair loss left them out (Jiang 2023).
Alopecia areata (limited evidence)
- Bimatoprost 0.03% regrew patches faster than mometasone in 30 people over 3 months, with fewer side effects (Zaher 2015), but a small randomised report found no benefit for lashes in alopecia areata (Roseborough 2009).
How it's used in studies
- Lashes: one drop of 0.03% on a sterile single-use applicator, drawn along the upper lid margin at the lash base once nightly. Extra applications do not speed growth (label).
- Trials judged lashes at 16 weeks. The label says lashes return to baseline after stopping.
- Eyebrows: 0.03% once or twice daily for 7 months, or 0.01% once daily for 6 months.
- Scalp (failed programme): about 1 mL of experimental solutions once or twice daily for 6 months.
- Alopecia areata patches: 0.03% twice daily or 0.01% for 12 weeks.
Side effects and safety
- Common: itchy and red eyes and skin darkening, about 3 to 4% each in trials. Less often eye irritation, dry eye and eyelid redness (label).
- Iris darkening: increased brown iris pigment can occur and is likely permanent. Eyelid-skin darkening usually reverses over weeks to months. An independent review argues the iris risk with lid-margin use has never been properly measured (Steinsapir 2021).
- Eyelid fat loss (hollowed upper lids): among four glaucoma prostaglandin drugs compared in 55 patients, bimatoprost caused the most (Li 2025). Blinded graders saw signs of it in companies' own before-and-after photos of prostaglandin lash serums, and one user's hollowing reversed 6 months after stopping (Jamison 2022).
- Hair where you do not want it: solution that repeatedly touches other skin can grow hair there.
- Glaucoma: it may blunt other prostaglandin glaucoma drops, so check with an eye doctor first. Remove soft contact lenses before applying.
- Pregnancy: no adequate studies; the label says to use it only if the benefit justifies the risk.
- Untested or undeclared serums bypass all of these warnings.
Bottom line
For eyelashes, bimatoprost is the best-evidenced option and the only approved one in the US: about three in four users get visibly longer, fuller, darker lashes after roughly four months, and the gains fade after stopping. The costs are a small risk of permanent iris darkening, especially in hazel or brown-green eyes, and eyelid hollowing. For brows it works off-label, and minoxidil gel did as well in one trial. For the scalp it failed to match minoxidil in about 850 people, so do not use it for pattern hair loss. A US retail price list shows roughly $57 to $305 for a Latisse bottle; compounded scalp mixes with minoxidil averaged about $159 per 60 mL in a 2024 survey despite the poor evidence (Choi 2024). Discuss with a doctor.
Fun facts
- Latisse exists because glaucoma patients using prostaglandin eye drops grew noticeably longer lashes; a side effect became the product.
- A year before Latisse was approved, US marshals seized about $2 million of a cosmetic lash product that secretly worked because it contained bimatoprost.
Studies 23
Smith S et al. Eyelash growth in subjects treated with bimatoprost: a multicenter, randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012
Tested: bimatoprost 0.03% vs vehicle on the upper lash line
Result: At least a 1-grade improvement in lash prominence in 78.1% vs 18.4% on vehicle; length, thickness and darkness all improved.
Read the study ↗Harii K et al. Bimatoprost for eyelash growth in Japanese subjects: two multicenter controlled studies. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014
Tested: bimatoprost 0.03% vs vehicle
Result: Responders 77.3% vs 17.6% (idiopathic, 173 people) and 88.9% vs 27.8% (after chemotherapy, 36 people).
Read the study ↗Glaser DA et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of bimatoprost solution 0.03% application to the eyelid margin for the treatment of idiopathic and chemotherapy-induced eyelash hypotrichosis: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol. 2015
Tested: bimatoprost 0.03% vs vehicle, with a stop-treatment period
Result: Composite responders at month 4 were 40.2% vs 6.8% (idiopathic); gains held about 2 months after stopping and largely faded by 4 to 6 months.
Read the study ↗Wirta D et al. Safety and efficacy of bimatoprost for eyelash growth in postchemotherapy subjects. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2015
Tested: bimatoprost 0.03% vs vehicle (3:1)
Result: Responders were 46.9% vs 18.2% at month 6 and 61.5% at month 12 with continued use.
Read the study ↗Borchert M et al. An evaluation of the safety and efficacy of bimatoprost for eyelash growth in pediatric subjects. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016
Tested: bimatoprost 0.03% vs vehicle
Result: Overall 70.8% vs 26.1% improved, but the benefit was significant only in healthy adolescents, not after chemotherapy or in alopecia areata.
Read the study ↗Carruthers J et al. Bimatoprost 0.03% for the treatment of eyebrow hypotrichosis. Dermatol Surg. 2016
Tested: bimatoprost 0.03% twice daily or once daily vs vehicle
Result: At least a 1-grade improvement in 83.9% (twice daily), 77.1% (once daily) and 43.0% (vehicle).
Read the study ↗Show 17 more studies
Suchonwanit P et al. Efficacy and safety of bimatoprost 0.01% for the treatment of eyebrow hypotrichosis: a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study. Dermatol Surg. 2019
Tested: bimatoprost 0.01% vs vehicle
Result: Eyebrow density and hair diameter improved more than with vehicle (P<0.001).
Read the study ↗Zaky MS et al. Comparative study of topical minoxidil 2% versus topical bimatoprost 0.01% versus topical bimatoprost 0.03% in treatment of eyebrow hypotrichosis: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Dermatol Res. 2023
Tested: minoxidil 2% gel vs bimatoprost 0.01% vs bimatoprost 0.03%
Result: All three improved with no significant difference between them.
Read the study ↗Allergan. Safety and efficacy study of bimatoprost in the treatment of men with androgenic alopecia. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01325337. Results posted 2014
Tested: three bimatoprost formulations vs vehicle vs minoxidil 5%
Result: Hair-count change was +13.1, +6.1 and +6.3 for bimatoprost vs +4.1 for vehicle and +21.9 hairs/cm2 for minoxidil.
Read the study ↗Allergan. Safety and efficacy study of bimatoprost in the treatment of women with female pattern hair loss. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01325350. Results posted 2014
Tested: three bimatoprost formulations vs vehicle vs minoxidil 2%
Result: Bimatoprost changed hair count by -0.4, -3.5 and +4.3 vs +1.1 for vehicle and +13.6 hairs/cm2 for minoxidil.
Read the study ↗Allergan. A safety and efficacy study of bimatoprost in men with androgenic alopecia. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01904721. Results posted 2015
Tested: twice-daily bimatoprost solutions vs vehicle
Result: Gains were +12.7 and +9.3 hairs/cm2 vs +5.8 on vehicle.
Read the study ↗Khidhir KG et al. The prostamide-related glaucoma therapy, bimatoprost, offers a novel approach for treating scalp alopecias. FASEB J. 2013
Tested: bimatoprost
Result: Bimatoprost increased hair production in cultured human scalp follicles and sped coat regrowth in mice; one co-author worked for Allergan.
Read the study ↗Khajeh Pour S et al. Local pharmacokinetics and tolerability of topically-applied bimatoprost to the scalp of male patients with androgenetic alopecia. Clin Transl Sci. 2026
Tested: 1% to 3% bimatoprost scalp formulations
Result: Scalp levels reached at least 10 times the concentration needed for maximal growth in isolated follicles.
Read the study ↗Ricar J et al. Topical bimatoprost in the treatment of eyelash loss in alopecia totalis and universalis: a prospective, open-label study. Dermatol Ther. 2022
Tested: topical bimatoprost on the lashes
Result: Only existing lashes grew; no new lashes appeared.
Read the study ↗Rahman MS et al. Screening and quantification of undeclared PGF2-alpha analogs in eyelash-enhancing cosmetic serums using LC-MS/MS. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2022
Tested: laboratory analysis
Result: 4 of 64 serums contained bimatoprost (3 not declared on the label) and 8 contained other prostaglandin analogues.
Read the study ↗Steinsapir KD, Steinsapir SMG. Revisiting the safety of prostaglandin analog eyelash growth products. Dermatol Surg. 2021
Tested: bimatoprost and related products
Result: Argues that iris darkening with lid-margin use has never been properly measured and that industry trials may have under-reported eyelid fat loss.
Read the study ↗Li W et al. Changes in prostaglandin-associated periorbital syndrome: a self-controlled and prospective study. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2025
Tested: four prostaglandin drugs compared
Result: Bimatoprost caused the most periorbital changes and latanoprost the least.
Read the study ↗Jamison A et al. Do prostaglandin analogue lash lengtheners cause eyelid fat and volume loss? Aesthet Surg J. 2022
Tested: prostaglandin lash serums
Result: Blinded graders saw signs of eyelid fat loss in company photos; one user's hollowing reversed 6 months after stopping.
Read the study ↗Zaher H et al. Bimatoprost versus mometasone furoate in the treatment of scalp alopecia areata: a pilot study. Dermatology. 2015
Tested: bimatoprost 0.03% vs mometasone on separate patches
Result: Bimatoprost patches regrew faster and more, with fewer side effects.
Read the study ↗Roseborough I et al. Lack of efficacy of topical latanoprost and bimatoprost ophthalmic solutions in promoting eyelash growth in patients with alopecia areata. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009
Tested: latanoprost and bimatoprost
Result: Reported no benefit for lashes in alopecia areata (a short letter).
Read the study ↗Latisse (bimatoprost ophthalmic solution) 0.03% prescribing information. Allergan/AbbVie. DailyMed
Tested: bimatoprost 0.03% once nightly on the upper lid margin
Result: Approved in the US for eyelash hypotrichosis; warns of permanent iris darkening and says lashes return to baseline after stopping.
Read the study ↗Jiang S et al. The efficacy of topical prostaglandin analogs for hair loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med. 2023
Tested: prostaglandin analogues (and topical cetirizine) vs placebo
Result: Pooled benefit was large (standardised difference 1.42) but heterogeneous, and the large negative industry scalp trials were not included.
Read the study ↗Choi J et al. Survey of the prices of topical compounded medications for alopecia in the tri-state area. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024
Tested: price survey
Result: Mean price was $141.91 per 60 mL for minoxidil 5% with latanoprost 0.02% and about $159 for compounded scalp mixes containing minoxidil.
Read the study ↗Related
- LatanoprostA cheap glaucoma eye drop that lengthens and darkens eyelashes, with only a small pilot trial behind its off-label use on the scalp.
- MinoxidilThe most widely used hair-growth treatment, available as a cheap over-the-counter lotion or foam and as a prescription tablet, with a mechanism that is still only partly understood.
- Topical cetirizineThe common allergy antihistamine, made up as a 1% scalp solution, has several small trials suggesting a modest effect that is weaker than minoxidil.
- SetipiprantAn oral blocker of the PGD2 receptor GPR44 that was tested for male pattern baldness on strong lab data and grew no more hair than placebo in 169 men.
- Prostaglandins and hairProstaglandins are fat-derived signals that switch follicles on or off; eye drops that copy one of them grow eyelashes but have not worked on the scalp.